State of Büchi complementation

From MaRDI portal
Publication:3073645

DOI10.1007/978-3-642-18098-9_28zbMATH Open1297.68168arXiv1406.4575OpenAlexW1562442213MaRDI QIDQ3073645FDOQ3073645


Authors: Ming-Hsien Tsai, Seth Fogarty, Moshe Y. Vardi, Yih-Kuen Tsay Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 11 February 2011

Published in: Implementation and Application of Automata (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Complementation of B"uchi automata has been studied for over five decades since the formalism was introduced in 1960. Known complementation constructions can be classified into Ramsey-based, determinization-based, rank-based, and slice-based approaches. Regarding the performance of these approaches, there have been several complexity analyses but very few experimental results. What especially lacks is a comparative experiment on all of the four approaches to see how they perform in practice. In this paper, we review the four approaches, propose several optimization heuristics, and perform comparative experimentation on four representative constructions that are considered the most efficient in each approach. The experimental results show that (1) the determinization-based Safra-Piterman construction outperforms the other three in producing smaller complements and finishing more tasks in the allocated time and (2) the proposed heuristics substantially improve the Safra-Piterman and the slice-based constructions.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.4575




Recommendations



Cites Work


Cited In (14)





This page was built for publication: State of Büchi complementation

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3073645)