Testing Mutual Independence Between Two Discrete-Valued Spatial Processes: A Correction to Pearson Chi-Squared
DOI10.1111/j.0006-341X.2002.00888.xzbMath1210.62224WikidataQ78698519 ScholiaQ78698519MaRDI QIDQ3079036
Publication date: 1 March 2011
Published in: Biometrics (Search for Journal in Brave)
spatial autocorrelationsubsamplingcontingency tablecategorical datafirst-order approximationhistorical ecological research
Inference from spatial processes (62M30) Nonparametric hypothesis testing (62G10) Time series, auto-correlation, regression, etc. in statistics (GARCH) (62M10) Applications of statistics to environmental and related topics (62P12) Monte Carlo methods (65C05) Contingency tables (62H17)
Related Items (7)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Limit theorems for the empirical vector of the Curie-Weiss-Potts model
- Limit theorems for multiply indexed mixing random variables, with application to Gibbs random fields
- Tests of homogeneity for spatial populations.
- Assessing the Significance of the Correlation between Two Spatial Processes
- Adjusted chi-squared tests for cross-classified tables of survey data
- The Analysis of Categorical Data From Complex Sample Surveys: Chi-Squared Tests for Goodness of Fit and Independence in Two-Way Tables
- Clustering on coloured lattices
- Modified Tests of Independence in 2 x 2 Tables with Spatial Data
- Window Subsampling of Estimating Functions with Application to Regression Models
This page was built for publication: Testing Mutual Independence Between Two Discrete-Valued Spatial Processes: A Correction to Pearson Chi-Squared