Inhomogeneity in spatial Cox point processes -- location dependent thinning is not the only option
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3082154
DOI10.5566/IAS.V29.P133-141zbMATH Open1219.60051OpenAlexW2036279231MaRDI QIDQ3082154FDOQ3082154
Authors: Michaela Prokešová
Publication date: 9 March 2011
Published in: Image Analysis & Stereology (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.5566/ias.v29.p133-141
Recommendations
- Thinning spatial point processes into Poisson processes
- Statistics for inhomogeneous space-time shot-noise Cox processes
- Inhomogeneous spatial point processes by location-dependent scaling
- Inhomogeneous Markov point processes by transformation
- Modelling marked point patterns by intensity-marked Cox processes
Cited In (10)
- On the higher order product density functions of a Neyman-Scott cluster point process
- Distinguishing different types of inhomogeneity in Neyman-Scott point processes
- Estimating second-order characteristics of inhomogeneous spatio-temporal point processes
- Statistics for inhomogeneous space-time shot-noise Cox processes
- Two step estimation for Neyman-Scott point process with inhomogeneous cluster centers
- Inhomogeneous spatial point processes by location-dependent scaling
- Hidden second-order stationary spatial point processes
- On the local approximation of mean densities of random closed sets
- Modelling the position of cell profiles allowing for both inhomogeneity and interaction
- Modelling aggregation on the large scale and regularity on the small scale in spatial point pattern datasets
This page was built for publication: Inhomogeneity in spatial Cox point processes -- location dependent thinning is not the only option
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3082154)