Distinguishing CPFSK from QAM and PSK modulations

DOI10.1007/S00034-015-0126-1MaRDI QIDQ308484zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Mohammad Bari, Milos Doroslovacki

Publication date 6 September 2016

Published in Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s00034-015-0126-1

zbMATH Keywords

Gaussian approximationsupport vector machineswaveletdigital modulation classificationroot-raised-cosine pulsessignal separation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Signal theory (characterization, reconstruction, filtering, etc.) (94A12) Modulation and demodulation in information and communication theory (94A14)

Recommendations

• Classification using wavelet packet decomposition and support vector machine for digital modulations
• Blind modulation classification for SDR application
• Automatic modulation type identification using WPA and SVM
• Classification of quadrature amplitude modulated (QAM) signals via sequential probability ratio test (SPRT)
• Classification of BPSK and QPSK signals using an antenna array

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 425777 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 824903 (Why is no real title available?)
• Time series: theory and methods

Cited in

(5)

• Classification using wavelet packet decomposition and support vector machine for digital modulations
• Blind modulation classification for SDR application
• Coding CPFSK for differential demodulation
• A method for robust classification of QPSK signals
• Classification of BPSK and QPSK signals using an antenna array

This page was built for publication: Distinguishing CPFSK from QAM and PSK modulations

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q308484)