3 j symbols: to normalize or not to normalize?

DOI10.1088/0143-0807/32/4/009MaRDI QIDQ3087791zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors Michel van Veenendaal

Publication date 17 August 2011

Published in European Journal of Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/32/4/009

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of group representations to physics and other areas of science (20C35) Applications of Lie groups to the sciences; explicit representations (22E70) Finite-dimensional groups and algebras motivated by physics and their representations (81R05)

Recommendations

• New construction of 3nj-symbols
• Comment an 'an interesting relation involving 3-j symbols'
• On the 3j symmetries
• Symmetry Properties of the 3j-Symbols for an Arbitrary Group
• Proof of interesting relations involving 3-j symbols
• Propriétés de symétrie des symboles à 3j de SU(n)
• \(3nj\)-symbols and identities for \(q\)-Bessel functions
• Accurate computation of individual and tables of \(3\)-\(j\) and \(6\)-\(j\) symbols
• About integer-valued variants of the theta and 6j symbols
• Standard Generators for J₃

This page was built for publication: 3 j symbols: to normalize or not to normalize?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3087791)