3 j symbols: to normalize or not to normalize?
DOI10.1088/0143-0807/32/4/009zbMATH Open1225.81070OpenAlexW2052043650WikidataQ99713096 ScholiaQ99713096MaRDI QIDQ3087791FDOQ3087791
Authors: Michel van Veenendaal 
Publication date: 17 August 2011
Published in: European Journal of Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/32/4/009
Recommendations
- New construction of 3nj-symbols
- Comment an 'an interesting relation involving 3-j symbols'
- On the 3j symmetries
- Symmetry Properties of the 3j-Symbols for an Arbitrary Group
- Proof of interesting relations involving 3-j symbols
- Propriétés de symétrie des symboles à 3j de SU(n)
- \(3nj\)-symbols and identities for \(q\)-Bessel functions
- Accurate computation of individual and tables of \(3\)-\(j\) and \(6\)-\(j\) symbols
- About integer-valued variants of the theta and 6j symbols
- Standard Generators for J3
Applications of group representations to physics and other areas of science (20C35) Applications of Lie groups to the sciences; explicit representations (22E70) Finite-dimensional groups and algebras motivated by physics and their representations (81R05)
This page was built for publication: 3 j symbols: to normalize or not to normalize?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3087791)
