Publisher’s Note: Entanglement is Not Necessary for Perfect Discrimination between Unitary Operations [Phys. Rev. Lett.PRLTAO0031-900798, 100503 (2007)]
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3107902
DOI10.1103/PHYSREVLETT.98.129901zbMATH Open1228.81080MaRDI QIDQ3107902FDOQ3107902
Authors:
Publication date: 26 December 2011
Published in: Physical Review Letters (Search for Journal in Brave)
Recommendations
- Entanglement is not necessary for perfect discrimination between unitary operations
- Entangling and disentangling power of unitary transformations are not equal
- Perfect discrimination of non-orthogonal separable pure states on bipartite system in general probabilistic theory
- Entanglement and unambiguous discrimination between non-orthogonal states
- Comparison of quantum discord and fully entangled fraction of two classes of \(d\otimes d^2\) states
- \(N\)-qubit system in a pure state: a necessary and sufficient condition for unentanglement
- Comment on ``Local copying of \(d\times d\)-dimensional partially entangled pure states
- Comment on ``High-dimensional deterministic multiparty quantum secret sharing without unitary operations
- Unitary invariant discord as a measures of bipartite quantum correlations in an \(N\)-qubit quantum system
- A note on parallel distinguishability of two quantum operations
Quantum computation (81P68) Quantum measurement theory, state operations, state preparations (81P15) Quantum coherence, entanglement, quantum correlations (81P40)
This page was built for publication: Publisher’s Note: Entanglement is Not Necessary for Perfect Discrimination between Unitary Operations [Phys. Rev. Lett.PRLTAO0031-900798, 100503 (2007)]
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3107902)
