REPRESENTING DEFAULTS IN THE FRAMEWORK OF POSSIBILITY THEORY∗
DOI10.1080/03081079708945163zbMATH Open0877.68106OpenAlexW2012955478MaRDI QIDQ3130057FDOQ3130057
Authors: Churn-Jung Liau 
Publication date: 8 December 1997
Published in: International Journal of General Systems (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/03081079708945163
Recommendations
Knowledge representation (68T30) Fuzzy sets and logic (in connection with information, communication, or circuits theory) (94D05) Fuzzy logic; logic of vagueness (03B52) Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)
Cites Work
- Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility
- Default reasoning and possibility theory
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- A logic for default reasoning
- Fuzzy sets in a approximate reasoning. I: Inference with possibility distributions
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- PRUF—a meaning representation language for natural languages
- Using approximate reasoning to represent default knowledge
- Cumulative default logic: In defense of nonmonotonic inference rules
- A generalized view of nonmonotonic knowledge: a set of theoretic perspective
- Formalizing nonmonotonic reasoning systems
Cited In (6)
- Representing Defaults and Negative Information Without Negation-as-Failure
- Logics in Artificial Intelligence
- Defaultable game options in a hazard process model
- Notions of sameness by default and their application to anaphora, vagueness, and uncertain reasoning
- Handling uncertainty and defeasibility in a possibilistic logic setting
- Title not available (Why is that?)
This page was built for publication: REPRESENTING DEFAULTS IN THE FRAMEWORK OF POSSIBILITY THEORY∗
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3130057)
