Crossing number is hard for kernelization
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3132876
Abstract: The graph crossing number problem, cr(G)<=k, asks for a drawing of a graph G in the plane with at most k edge crossings. Although this problem is in general notoriously difficult, it is fixed- parameter tractable for the parameter k [Grohe]. This suggests a closely related question of whether this problem has a polynomial kernel, meaning whether every instance of cr(G)<=k can be in polynomial time reduced to an equivalent instance of size polynomial in k (and independent of |G|). We answer this question in the negative. Along the proof we show that the tile crossing number problem of twisted planar tiles is NP-hard, which has been an open problem for some time, too, and then employ the complexity technique of cross-composition. Our result holds already for the special case of graphs obtained from planar graphs by adding one edge.
Recommendations
Cited in
(7)- Structure and generation of crossing-critical graphs
- Crossing minimization in perturbed drawings
- Deciding Parity of Graph Crossing Number
- Connecting the dots (with minimum crossings)
- Grid recognition: classical and parameterized computational perspectives
- Parameterized analysis and crossing minimization problems
- Exact crossing number parameterized by vertex cover
This page was built for publication: Crossing number is hard for kernelization
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3132876)