Five weaknesses of ASPIC^+
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3143396
DOI10.1007/978-3-642-31718-7_13zbMATH Open1252.68271OpenAlexW169845934MaRDI QIDQ3143396FDOQ3143396
Authors: Leila Amgoud 
Publication date: 30 November 2012
Published in: Communications in Computer and Information Science (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31718-7_13
Recommendations
- On the links between argumentation-based reasoning and nonmonotonic reasoning
- Corrigendum to: ``A general account of argumentation with preferences
- Two aspects of relevance in structured argumentation: minimality and paraconsistency
- A comparative study of some central notions of \(\mathit{ASPIC}^+\) and \textit{DeLP}
- Some reflections on two current trends in formal argumentation
Cites Work
- Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
- Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
- A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks
This page was built for publication: Five weaknesses of ASPIC\(^+\)
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3143396)
