Five weaknesses of ASPIC^+

DOI10.1007/978-3-642-31718-7_13MaRDI QIDQ3143396zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Leila Amgoud

Publication date 30 November 2012

Published in Communications in Computer and Information Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31718-7_13

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Recommendations

• On the links between argumentation-based reasoning and nonmonotonic reasoning
• Corrigendum to: ``A general account of argumentation with preferences
• Two aspects of relevance in structured argumentation: minimality and paraconsistency
• A comparative study of some central notions of \(\mathit{ASPIC}^+\) and \textit{DeLP}
• Some reflections on two current trends in formal argumentation

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2072514 (Why is no real title available?)
• A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks
• Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
• On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
• Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks

Cited in

(4)

• A comparative study of some central notions of \(\mathit{ASPIC}^+\) and \textit{DeLP}
• On the links between argumentation-based reasoning and nonmonotonic reasoning
• Two aspects of relevance in structured argumentation: minimality and paraconsistency
• On the relationship between DeLP and ASPIC^+

This page was built for publication: Five weaknesses of ASPIC\(^+\)

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3143396)