Fields of moduli of classical Humbert curves

From MaRDI portal
Publication:3145529

DOI10.1093/QMATH/HAR017zbMATH Open1258.14033arXiv1609.04895OpenAlexW2111566134MaRDI QIDQ3145529FDOQ3145529

Rubén A. Hidalgo, Sebastián Reyes-Carocca

Publication date: 21 December 2012

Published in: The Quarterly Journal of Mathematics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: The computation of the field of moduli of a closed Riemann surface seems to be a very difficult problem and even more difficult is to determine if the field of moduli is a field of definition. In this paper we consider the family of closed Riemann surfaces of genus five admitting a group of conformal automorphisms isomorphic to mathbbZ24. These surfaces are non-hyperelliptic ones and turn out to be the highest branched abelian covers of the orbifolds of genus zero and five cone points of order two. We compute the field of moduli of these surfaces and we prove that they are fields of definition. This result is in contrast with the case of the highest branched abelian covers of the orbifolds of genus zero and six cone points of order two as there are cases for which the above property fails.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.04895




Recommendations





Cited In (5)





This page was built for publication: Fields of moduli of classical Humbert curves

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3145529)