Fields of moduli of classical Humbert curves

DOI10.1093/QMATH/HAR017zbMATH Open1258.14033arXiv1609.04895OpenAlexW2111566134MaRDI QIDQ3145529FDOQ3145529

Authors: Sebastián Reyes-Carocca, Rubén A. Hidalgo 

Publication date: 21 December 2012

Published in: The Quarterly Journal of Mathematics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: The computation of the field of moduli of a closed Riemann surface seems to be a very difficult problem and even more difficult is to determine if the field of moduli is a field of definition. In this paper we consider the family of closed Riemann surfaces of genus five admitting a group of conformal automorphisms isomorphic to ${mathbbZ}_2^4$. These surfaces are non-hyperelliptic ones and turn out to be the highest branched abelian covers of the orbifolds of genus zero and five cone points of order two. We compute the field of moduli of these surfaces and we prove that they are fields of definition. This result is in contrast with the case of the highest branched abelian covers of the orbifolds of genus zero and six cone points of order two as there are cases for which the above property fails.

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.04895

Recommendations

• Generalized Humbert curves
• Fields of moduli and definition of hyperelliptic covers
• Field of moduli of generalized Fermat curves
• Fields of moduli of some special curves
• Fields of moduli and fields of definition of odd signature curves

zbMATH Keywords

Riemann surfacesalgebraic curvesmodulifield of definition

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Families, moduli of curves (algebraic) (14H10) Compact Riemann surfaces and uniformization (30F10)

Cited In (6)

• Generalized Humbert curves
• Weil’s Galois descent theorem from a computational point of view
• On the tautological ring of Humbert curves
• Finite collineation groups and birational rigidity
• On the one-dimensional family of Riemann surfaces of genus \(q\) with 4\(q\) automorphisms
• On large prime actions on Riemann surfaces

This page was built for publication: Fields of moduli of classical Humbert curves

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3145529)