Pervasive algebras and maximal subalgebras
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3174484
DOI10.4064/SM206-1-1zbMATH Open1241.46028arXiv1005.0719OpenAlexW2100797666MaRDI QIDQ3174484FDOQ3174484
Authors: Pamela Gorkin, Anthony O'Farrell
Publication date: 14 October 2011
Published in: Studia Mathematica (Search for Journal in Brave)
Abstract: A uniform algebra on its Shilov boundary is {em maximal} if is not and there is no uniform algebra properly contained between and . It is {em essentially pervasive} if is dense in whenever is a proper closed subset of the essential set of . If is maximal, then it is essentially pervasive and proper. We explore the gap between these two concepts. We show the following: (1) If is pervasive and proper, and has a nonconstant unimodular element, then contains an infinite descending chain of pervasive subalgebras on . (2) It is possible to imbed a copy of the lattice of all subsets of into the family of pervasive subalgebras of some . (3) In the other direction, if is strongly logmodular, proper and pervasive, then it is maximal. (4) This fails if the word lq strongly' is removed. We discuss further examples, involving Dirichlet algebras, algebras, Douglas algebras, and subalgebras of . We develop some new results that relate pervasiveness, maximality and relative maximality to support sets of representing measures.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1005.0719
Recommendations
Cited In (4)
This page was built for publication: Pervasive algebras and maximal subalgebras
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3174484)