Pervasive algebras and maximal subalgebras

From MaRDI portal
Publication:3174484

DOI10.4064/SM206-1-1zbMATH Open1241.46028arXiv1005.0719OpenAlexW2100797666MaRDI QIDQ3174484FDOQ3174484


Authors: Pamela Gorkin, Anthony O'Farrell Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 14 October 2011

Published in: Studia Mathematica (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: A uniform algebra A on its Shilov boundary X is {em maximal} if A is not C(X) and there is no uniform algebra properly contained between A and C(X). It is {em essentially pervasive} if A is dense in C(F) whenever F is a proper closed subset of the essential set of A. If A is maximal, then it is essentially pervasive and proper. We explore the gap between these two concepts. We show the following: (1) If A is pervasive and proper, and has a nonconstant unimodular element, then A contains an infinite descending chain of pervasive subalgebras on X. (2) It is possible to imbed a copy of the lattice of all subsets of N into the family of pervasive subalgebras of some C(X). (3) In the other direction, if A is strongly logmodular, proper and pervasive, then it is maximal. (4) This fails if the word lq strongly' is removed. We discuss further examples, involving Dirichlet algebras, A(U) algebras, Douglas algebras, and subalgebras of Hinfty(mathbbD). We develop some new results that relate pervasiveness, maximality and relative maximality to support sets of representing measures.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1005.0719




Recommendations





Cited In (4)





This page was built for publication: Pervasive algebras and maximal subalgebras

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3174484)