Anomalies in the Foundations of Ridge Regression

From MaRDI portal
Publication:3182012

DOI10.1111/J.1751-5823.2007.00041.XzbMATH Open1206.62129arXivmath/0703551OpenAlexW2087871315WikidataQ57447150 ScholiaQ57447150MaRDI QIDQ3182012FDOQ3182012

Donald E. Ramirez, Donald R. Jensen

Publication date: 1 October 2009

Published in: International Statistical Review (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Anomalies persist in the foundations of ridge regression as set forth in Hoerl and Kennard (1970) and subsequently. Conventional ridge estimators and their properties do not follow on constraining lengths of solution vectors using LaGrange's method, as claimed. Estimators so constrained have singular distributions; the proposed solutions are not necessarily minimizing; and heretofore undiscovered bounds are exhibited for the ridge parameter. None of the considerable literature on estimation, prediction, cross--validation, choice of ridge parameter, and related issues, collectively known as ridge regression, is consistent with constrained optimization, nor with corresponding inequality constraints. The problem is traced to a misapplication of LaGrange's principle, failure to recognize the singularity of distributions, and misplaced links between constraints and the ridge parameter. Other principles, based on condition numbers, are seen to validate both conventional ridge and surrogate ridge regression to be defined. Numerical studies illustrate that ridge analysis often exhibits some of the same pathologies it is intended to redress.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0703551





Cites Work


Cited In (16)


   Recommendations





This page was built for publication: Anomalies in the Foundations of Ridge Regression

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3182012)