Non-semistable exceptional objects in hereditary categories: some remarks and conjectures

From MaRDI portal
Publication:3187331

DOI10.1090/CONM/643/12901zbMATH Open1346.18016arXiv1405.2943OpenAlexW1501332318MaRDI QIDQ3187331FDOQ3187331

G. Dimitrov, Ludmil Katzarkov

Publication date: 2 September 2016

Published in: Stacks and Categories in Geometry, Topology, and Algebra (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: In our previous paper we studied non-semistable exceptional objects in hereditary categories and introduced the notion of regularity preserving category, but we obtained quite a few examples of such categories. Certain conditions on the Ext-nontrivial couples (exceptional objects X,YinmathcalA with mExt1(X,Y)eq0 and mExt1(Y,X)eq0) were shown to imply regularity-preserving. This paper is a brief review of the previous paper (with emphasis on regularity preserving property) and we add some remarks and conjectures. It is known that in Dynkin quivers mHom(ho,ho)=0 or mExt1(ho,ho)=0 for any two exceptional representations. In the present paper we use this property to show that for any Dynkin quiver Q there are no Ext-nontrivial couples in Repk(Q), which implies regularity preserving of Repk(Q), where k is an algebraically closed field. We study this property in other quivers. In particular in any star quiver with three arms Q for any two exceptional representations ho,ho we have mHom(ho,ho)=0 or mExt1(ho,ho)=0 provided that ho or ho is a thin representation. In the previous version we asserted falsely that this holds for any two exceptional representations (without imposing the restriction that one of them is thin) for extended Dynkin quivers widetildemathbbE6,widetildemathbbE7,widetildemathbbE8.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2943






Cited In (5)






This page was built for publication: Non-semistable exceptional objects in hereditary categories: some remarks and conjectures

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3187331)