What can argumentation do for inconsistent ontology query answering?

DOI10.1007/978-3-642-40381-1_2MaRDI QIDQ3189562zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Madalina Croitoru, Srdjan Vesic

Publication date 11 September 2014

Published in Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40381-1_2

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27) Knowledge representation (68T30) Theory of languages and software systems (knowledge-based systems, expert systems, etc.) for artificial intelligence (68T35)

Recommendations

• Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
• Logic-based argumentation with existential rules
• Sets of attacking arguments for inconsistent Datalog knowledge bases
• Argumentative logics: Reasoning with classically inconsistent information
• Inconsistent-tolerant base revision through argument theory change

Cited in

(10)

• How does incoherence affect inconsistency-tolerant semantics for Datalog^?
• Logic-based argumentation with existential rules
• Investigating the mapping between default logic and inconsistency-tolerant semantics
• Translating preferred subtheories into structured argumentation
• Reasoning and evolution of consistent ontologies using NORM
• Cognitive context and arguments from ontologies for learning
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 809138 (Why is no real title available?)
• An argumentation system for reasoning with LPm
• Computing repairs under functional and inclusion dependencies via argumentation
• Inconsistency-tolerant semantics based on (preferred) repairs (invited paper)

This page was built for publication: What can argumentation do for inconsistent ontology query answering?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3189562)