What can argumentation do for inconsistent ontology query answering?
DOI10.1007/978-3-642-40381-1_2zbMATH Open1403.68285OpenAlexW2222319649MaRDI QIDQ3189562FDOQ3189562
Authors: Madalina Croitoru, Srdjan Vesic 
Publication date: 11 September 2014
Published in: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40381-1_2
Recommendations
- Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
- Logic-based argumentation with existential rules
- Sets of attacking arguments for inconsistent Datalog knowledge bases
- Argumentative logics: Reasoning with classically inconsistent information
- Inconsistent-tolerant base revision through argument theory change
Knowledge representation (68T30) Theory of languages and software systems (knowledge-based systems, expert systems, etc.) for artificial intelligence (68T35) Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)
Cited In (6)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Reasoning and evolution of consistent ontologies using NORM
- Computing repairs under functional and inclusion dependencies via argumentation
- Cognitive context and arguments from ontologies for learning
- Logic-based argumentation with existential rules
- How does incoherence affect inconsistency-tolerant semantics for Datalog\(^\pm\)?
This page was built for publication: What can argumentation do for inconsistent ontology query answering?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3189562)
