On the axiomatizability of impossible futures

From MaRDI portal
Publication:3196348

DOI10.2168/LMCS-11(3:17)2015zbMATH Open1448.68335arXiv1505.04985MaRDI QIDQ3196348FDOQ3196348

Taolue Chen, Wan Fokkink, Rob van Glabbeek

Publication date: 29 October 2015

Published in: Logical Methods in Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: A general method is established to derive a ground-complete axiomatization for a weak semantics from such an axiomatization for its concrete counterpart, in the context of the process algebra BCCS. This transformation moreover preserves omega-completeness. It is applicable to semantics at least as coarse as impossible futures semantics. As an application, ground- and omega-complete axiomatizations are derived for weak failures, completed trace and trace semantics. We then present a finite, sound, ground-complete axiomatization for the concrete impossible futures preorder, which implies a finite, sound, ground-complete axiomatization for the weak impossible futures preorder. In contrast, we prove that no finite, sound axiomatization for BCCS modulo concrete and weak impossible futures equivalence is ground-complete. If the alphabet of actions is infinite, then the aforementioned ground-complete axiomatizations are shown to be omega-complete. If the alphabet is finite, we prove that the inequational theories of BCCS modulo the concrete and weak impossible futures preorder lack such a finite basis.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.04985




Recommendations





Cited In (5)





This page was built for publication: On the axiomatizability of impossible futures

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3196348)