Does mean-variance portfolio management deserve expected utility's approximative affirmation?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:320060
DOI10.1016/J.EJOR.2015.06.010zbMATH Open1346.91214OpenAlexW603328665MaRDI QIDQ320060FDOQ320060
Authors: Otto Loistl
Publication date: 6 October 2016
Published in: European Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.06.010
Recommendations
- Mean-variance approximations to expected utility
- Markowitz revisited: mean-variance models in financial portfolio analysis
- Is mean-variance analysis applicable to hedge funds?
- Elementary proof that mean-variance implies quadratic utility
- The opportunity cost of mean-variance choice under estimation risk
Cites Work
- Mean-variance approximations to expected utility
- Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation
- Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large
- A characterization of the distributions that imply mean-variance utility functions
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
Cited In (6)
- Robust portfolio optimization with fuzzy TODIM, genetic algorithm and multi-criteria constraints
- Mean-variance approximations to expected utility
- Risk- and value-based management for non-life insurers under solvency constraints
- Second order of stochastic dominance efficiency vs mean variance efficiency
- A Stein type lemma for the multivariate generalized hyperbolic distribution
- The origins of the mean-variance approach in finance: revisiting de Finetti 65 years later
This page was built for publication: Does mean-variance portfolio management deserve expected utility's approximative affirmation?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q320060)