The Complexity of Rooted Phylogeny Problems

From MaRDI portal
Publication:3224696

DOI10.2168/LMCS-7(4:6)2011zbMATH Open1237.68095arXiv1110.0693MaRDI QIDQ3224696FDOQ3224696


Authors: Manuel Bodirsky, Jens K. Mueller Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 2 April 2012

Published in: Logical Methods in Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Several computational problems in phylogenetic reconstruction can be formulated as restrictions of the following general problem: given a formula in conjunctive normal form where the literals are rooted triples, is there a rooted binary tree that satisfies the formula? If the formulas do not contain disjunctions, the problem becomes the famous rooted triple consistency problem, which can be solved in polynomial time by an algorithm of Aho, Sagiv, Szymanski, and Ullman. If the clauses in the formulas are restricted to disjunctions of negated triples, Ng, Steel, and Wormald showed that the problem remains NP-complete. We systematically study the computational complexity of the problem for all such restrictions of the clauses in the input formula. For certain restricted disjunctions of triples we present an algorithm that has sub-quadratic running time and is asymptotically as fast as the fastest known algorithm for the rooted triple consistency problem. We also show that any restriction of the general rooted phylogeny problem that does not fall into our tractable class is NP-complete, using known results about the complexity of Boolean constraint satisfaction problems. Finally, we present a pebble game argument that shows that the rooted triple consistency problem (and also all generalizations studied in this paper) cannot be solved by Datalog.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1110.0693




Recommendations





Cited In (8)





This page was built for publication: The Complexity of Rooted Phylogeny Problems

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3224696)