Numerical evaluation of the compound Poisson distribution: Recursion or Fast Fourier Transform?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3339141
DOI10.1080/03461238.1984.10413759zbMath0547.62069OpenAlexW2039184792MaRDI QIDQ3339141
Publication date: 1984
Published in: Scandinavian Actuarial Journal (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/03461238.1984.10413759
Applications of statistics to actuarial sciences and financial mathematics (62P05) Numerical methods for trigonometric approximation and interpolation (65T40) Probabilistic methods, stochastic differential equations (65C99)
Related Items
Proportional convergence and tail-cutting techniques in evaluating aggregate claim distributions ⋮ Compound model for two dependent kinds of claim ⋮ Feller-Ross-Approximation für Summenverteilungen ⋮ Recursions and fast Fourier transforms for a new bivariate aggregate claims model ⋮ Computing compound distributions faster! ⋮ Numerical algorithms for Panjer recursion by applying Bernstein approximation ⋮ The total claims amount of largest claims reinsurance treaties revisited ⋮ Forecasting aggregate claims using score‐driven time series models ⋮ Some applications of the fast Fourier transform algorithm in insurance mathematics This paper is dedicated to Professor W. S. Jewell on the occasion of his 60th birthday ⋮ Determination of the distribution of total loss from the fractional moments of its exponential ⋮ A new method for evaluating the distribution of aggregate claims ⋮ Speedy convolution algorithms and Panjer recursions for phase-type distributions ⋮ Securitization of motor insurance loss rate risks ⋮ Negative claim amounts, Bessel functions, linear programming and Miller's algorithm ⋮ Improved recursions for some compound Poisson distributions ⋮ On maximum likelihood estimation for count data models ⋮ Compound bivariate Lagrangian Poisson distributions ⋮ Panjer recursion versus FFT for compound distributions ⋮ The discrete-time risk model with correlated classes of business ⋮ How to (and how not to) compute stop-loss premiums in practice
Cites Work