A Comparison of the Performance of Three Flexible Functional Forms
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3343294
DOI10.2307/2648788zbMath0551.62078OpenAlexW2051325781MaRDI QIDQ3343294
C. A. Knox Lovell, Robin C. Sickles, David K. Guilkey
Publication date: 1983
Published in: International Economic Review (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/2648788
Related Items (18)
Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes ⋮ Total-factor-productivity measurement when equilibrium is temporary ⋮ The three-dimensional global properties of the minflex Laurent, generalized Leontief, and translog flexible functional forms ⋮ Productivity trends in U.S. manufacturing: evidence from the NQ and AIM cost functions ⋮ Non-parametric, unconditional quantile estimation for efficiency analysis with an application to Federal Reserve check processing operations ⋮ The global properties of the two minflex Laurent flexible functional forms ⋮ Regularity of the Generalized Quadratic Production Model: A Counterexample ⋮ Simulation designs for production frontiers ⋮ Semi-nonparametric estimates of substitution elasticities ⋮ Flexibility and regularity properties of the asymptotically ideal production model ⋮ Comparative performance analysis of frontier-based efficiency measurement methods -- a Monte Carlo simulation ⋮ Revisiting the flexibility and regularity properties of the asymptotically ideal production model ⋮ Returns to scale in a matching model of the labor market ⋮ Generalized quadratic revenue functions ⋮ Global restrictions on the parameters of the CDES indirect utility function ⋮ Seminonparametric Bayesian estimation of the asymptotically ideal production model ⋮ Imposing curvature restrictions on flexible functional forms ⋮ Evaluating the semi-nonparametric Fourier, aim, and neural networks cost functions
This page was built for publication: A Comparison of the Performance of Three Flexible Functional Forms
