DO TECHNOLOGY SHOCKS DRIVE HOURS UP OR DOWN? A LITTLE EVIDENCE FROM AN AGNOSTIC PROCEDURE

DOI10.1017/S1365100505040356MaRDI QIDQ3367660zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Elena Pesavento, Barbara Rossi

Publication date 25 January 2006

Published in Macroeconomic Dynamics (Search for Journal in Brave)

zbMATH Keywords

technology shockshours workedpositive productivity

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Economic growth models (91B62)

Recommendations

• Technology shocks and hours worked: a fractional integration perspective
• The effects of permanent technology shocks on hours: can the RBC-model fit the VAR evidence?
• Revisiting the effect of a technology shock on hours
• What (really) accounts for the fall in hours after a technology shock?
• The dynamics of hours worked and technology

Cites work

• Confidence intervals for autoregressive coefficients near one
• Efficient Tests for an Autoregressive Unit Root
• How accurate are confidence intervals for impulse responses in large VAR models?
• Testing for unit roots with stationary covariates
• Understanding Unit Rooters: A Helicopter Tour

Cited in

(7)

• The effects of permanent technology shocks on hours: can the RBC-model fit the VAR evidence?
• ROBUST INFERENCE IN STRUCTURAL VECTOR AUTOREGRESSIONS WITH LONG-RUN RESTRICTIONS
• Comparing DSGE-VAR forecasting models: how big are the differences?
• Rule-of-thumb consumers, productivity, and hours
• Revisiting the effect of a technology shock on hours
• What (really) accounts for the fall in hours after a technology shock?
• Technology shocks and hours worked: a fractional integration perspective

This page was built for publication: DO TECHNOLOGY SHOCKS DRIVE HOURS UP OR DOWN? A LITTLE EVIDENCE FROM AN AGNOSTIC PROCEDURE

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3367660)