P ≠ NP ∩ co-NP for Infinite Time Turing Machines
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3374094
Abstract: Schindler recently addressed two versions of the question P NP for Turing machines running in transfinite ordinal time. These versions differ in their definition of input length. The corresponding complexity classes are labelled P, NP and . Schindler showed that P NP and . We show that P NP co-NP and NP co-NP, whereas NP co-NP and co-NP.
Recommendations
- P NP for infinite time Turing machines
- P ≠ NP for all infinite Boolean algebras
- Infinite-time Turing machines and Borel reducibility
- Strong co-nondeterministic lower bounds for NP cannot be proved feasibly
- Pf ≠ NPf for almost all f
- Beyond \(\mathbf{P}^{\mathbf{NP}}=\mathbf{NEXP}\)
- Inapproximability of Nondeterministic State and Transition Complexity Assuming P ≠ NP
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2163541
- New Computational Paradigms
- \(\text{NP}\not={co}\)-NP and models of arithmetic
Cited in
(14)- Turing machines with atoms
- The semaphore codes attached to a Turing machine via resets and their various limits
- P NP for infinite time Turing machines
- Symmetry for transfinite computability
- Koepke machines and satisfiability for infinitary propositional languages
- Characteristics of discrete transfinite time Turing machine models: Halting times, stabilization times, and normal form theorems
- Infinite-time Turing machines and Borel reducibility
- Pf ≠ NPf for almost all f
- Some observations on infinitary complexity
- Is P = PSPACE for Infinite Time Turing Machines?
- Bounding lemmata for non-deterministic halting times of transfinite Turing machines
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1759437 (Why is no real title available?)
- P ≠ NP for all infinite Boolean algebras
- \(S_{k,\text{exp}}\) does not prove \(\text{NP} = \text{co-NP}\) uniformly
This page was built for publication: P ≠ NP ∩ co-NP for Infinite Time Turing Machines
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3374094)