Reconciling Bayesian epistemology and narration-based approaches to judiciary fact-finding

MaRDI QIDQ3384089zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Rafal Urbaniak

Publication date 14 December 2021

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.08763, http://eptcs.web.cse.unsw.edu.au/paper.cgi?TARK2017.37

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Foundations and philosophical topics in statistics (62A01) Applications of statistics to social sciences (62P25) Bayesian problems; characterization of Bayes procedures (62C10)

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7659877
• Bayesian epistemology.
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7533310
• The geometry of legal principles
• Probability in the law: a plea for not making do

Cites work

• Partial probability functions and intuitionistic logic
• Probabilistic canonical models for partial logics

Cited in

(1)

• Resolving the Cohenian paradox in judicial probability theory

This page was built for publication: Reconciling Bayesian epistemology and narration-based approaches to judiciary fact-finding

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3384089)