Reconciling Bayesian epistemology and narration-based approaches to judiciary fact-finding

zbMATH Open1483.62007arXiv1707.08763MaRDI QIDQ3384089FDOQ3384089

Authors: Rafal Urbaniak 

Publication date: 14 December 2021

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.08763

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7659877
• Bayesian epistemology.
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7533310
• The geometry of legal principles
• Probability in the law: a plea for not making do

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Foundations and philosophical topics in statistics (62A01) Applications of statistics to social sciences (62P25) Bayesian problems; characterization of Bayes procedures (62C10)

Cites Work

• Probabilistic canonical models for partial logics
• Partial probability functions and intuitionistic logic

Cited In (1)

• Resolving the Cohenian paradox in judicial probability theory

This page was built for publication: Reconciling Bayesian epistemology and narration-based approaches to judiciary fact-finding

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3384089)