Meyer's struggle with presentism or how we can understand the debate between presentism and eternalism

DOI10.12775/LLP.2019.018zbMATH Open1458.03007WikidataQ119268491 ScholiaQ119268491MaRDI QIDQ3387899FDOQ3387899

Authors: Jerzy Gołosz 

Publication date: 8 January 2021

Published in: Logic and Logical Philosophy (Search for Journal in Brave)

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6423731
• The triviality argument against presentism
• Presentism remains
• Temporal ontology: tenselessness and quantification
• Tensed truthmaker theory

zbMATH Keywords

eternalismpresentismpassage of timetenseless theory of timeA-theory of timeB-theory of timetensed theory of timetriviality objection

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• The nature of time
• Title not available (Why is that?)

Cited In (8)

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Presentism and black holes
• No presentism in quantum gravity
• Presentism meets black holes
• This moment and the next moment
• Numerical quantification and temporal intervals: a span-er in the works for presentism?
• Temporary safety hazards
• Temporal ontology: tenselessness and quantification

This page was built for publication: Meyer's struggle with presentism or how we can understand the debate between presentism and eternalism

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3387899)