Meyer's struggle with presentism or how we can understand the debate between presentism and eternalism

DOI10.12775/LLP.2019.018MaRDI QIDQ3387899zbMATH OpenWikidataFDO

Authors Jerzy Gołosz

Publication date 8 January 2021

Published in Logic and Logical Philosophy (Search for Journal in Brave)

zbMATH Keywords

eternalismpresentismpassage of timetenseless theory of timeA-theory of timeB-theory of timetensed theory of timetriviality objection

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6423731
• The triviality argument against presentism
• Presentism remains
• Temporal ontology: tenselessness and quantification
• Tensed truthmaker theory

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3747104 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6423731 (Why is no real title available?)
• The nature of time

Cited in

(8)

• Presentism and black holes
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6423731 (Why is no real title available?)
• No presentism in quantum gravity
• Presentism meets black holes
• This moment and the next moment
• Numerical quantification and temporal intervals: a span-er in the works for presentism?
• Temporary safety hazards
• Temporal ontology: tenselessness and quantification

This page was built for publication: Meyer's struggle with presentism or how we can understand the debate between presentism and eternalism

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3387899)