O IS NOT ENOUGH

DOI10.1017/S1755020309090236zbMath1175.03017MaRDI QIDQ3395328

Rob Simmonds, Jeffrey Bruce Paris

Publication date: 26 August 2009

Published in: The Review of Symbolic Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

zbMATH Keywords

completeness; probabilistic inference; consequence relations; Horn rules

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

03B60: Other nonclassical logic

03B48: Probability and inductive logic

68T37: Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence

Related Items

Unnamed Item, REWARD VERSUS RISK IN UNCERTAIN INFERENCE: THEOREMS AND SIMULATIONS, New Horn Rules for Probabilistic Consequence: Is $$\mathrm{O}{+}$$ Enough?, Lossy Inference Rules and Their Bounds: A Brief Review, A PROBABILISTIC SEMANTICS FOR COUNTERFACTUALS. PART A, When adjunction fails, Logical questions behind the lottery and preface paradoxes: lossy rules for uncertain inference, The logic of risky knowledge, reprised, Qualitative probabilistic inference under varied entropy levels, Conditional probability in the light of qualitative belief change, A utility based evaluation of logico-probabilistic systems, Foundations of everyday practical reasoning

Cites Work

• Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics
• What does a conditional knowledge base entail?
• On the logic of nonmonotonic conditionals and conditional probabilities
• The quantitative/qualitative watershed for rules of uncertain inference
• Nonmonotonic conditionals that behave like conditional probabilities above a threshold