Ultrafilters with property ( {s})

From MaRDI portal
Publication:3395585

DOI10.1090/S0002-9939-09-09919-5zbMATH Open1182.03079arXivmath/0310438MaRDI QIDQ3395585FDOQ3395585


Authors: Arnold W. Miller Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 11 September 2009

Published in: Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: A set X which is a subset of the Cantor set has property (s) (Marczewski (Spzilrajn)) iff for every perfect set P there exists a perfect set Q contained in P such that Q is a subset of X or Q is disjoint from X. Suppose U is a nonprincipal ultrafilter on omega. It is not difficult to see that if U is preserved by Sacks forcing, i.e., it generates an ultrafilter in the generic extension after forcing with the partial order of perfect sets, then U has property (s) in the ground model. It is known that selective ultrafilters or even P-points are preserved by Sacks forcing. On the other hand (answering a question raised by Hrusak) we show that assuming CH (or more generally MA for ctble posets) there exists an ultrafilter U with property (s) such that U does not generate an ultrafilter in any extension which adds a new subset of omega. http://www.math.wisc.edu/~miller/res/index.html miller@math.wisc.edu


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0310438




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (9)





This page was built for publication: Ultrafilters with property $( {s})$

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3395585)