Is repeatability an unbiased criterion for ranking feature detectors?

DOI10.1137/15M1007732MaRDI QIDQ3454502zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Ives Rey-Otero, Mauricio Delbracio

Publication date 25 November 2015

Published in SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences (Search for Journal in Brave)

zbMATH Keywords

performance evaluationimage matchingdescriptorsfeature detectorsscale invariant feature transform (SIFT)repeatability criteria

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Pattern recognition, speech recognition (68T10) Image processing (compression, reconstruction, etc.) in information and communication theory (94A08) Artificial intelligence for robotics (68T40) Machine vision and scene understanding (68T45)

Recommendations

• Evaluation of interest point detectors
• Computer Vision - ECCV 2004
• Detectors of extremal feature points on images
• Scale selection properties of generalized scale-space interest point detectors
• Computer Vision - ECCV 2004

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1229396 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 517283 (Why is no real title available?)
• Coding images with local features
• Computer Vision - ECCV 2004
• Evaluation of interest point detectors
• Extracting meaningful curves from images
• Photographing paintings by image fusion
• SIFER: scale-invariant feature detector with error resilience

Cited in

(5)

• Evaluation of interest point detectors and feature descriptors for visual tracking
• A unified B-spline framework for scale-invariant keypoint detection
• Evaluation of interest point detectors
• Detectors of extremal feature points on images
• Coding images with local features

Describes a project that uses

Uses Software

• SIFER
• BRISK
• SURF
• SIFT

This page was built for publication: Is repeatability an unbiased criterion for ranking feature detectors?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3454502)