Robustness instead of accuracy should be the primary objective for subjective pattern recognition research: stability analysis on multicandidate electoral college versus direct popular vote
DOI10.1111/J.1467-8640.2012.00439.XzbMATH Open1328.68182OpenAlexW2132319264MaRDI QIDQ3462269FDOQ3462269
Authors: Liang Chen 
Publication date: 5 January 2016
Published in: Computational Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8640.2012.00439.x
Recommendations
- A general stability analysis on regional and national voting schemes against noise -- why is an electoral college more stable than a direct popular election?
- Designing stable elections
- Choice from a three-element set: Some lessons of the 2000 presidential campaign in the United States
- “One Man, One Vote” Part 1: Electoral Justice in the U.S. Electoral College: Banzhaf and Shapley/Shubik Versus May
- A geometric model of sensitivity of multistage elections to change
machine learningstabilityimage processingrepresentationscomputer visiondecision supportsimilarity measuresscene understandingknowledge retrievalnational votingregional votingperceptual reasoning
Learning and adaptive systems in artificial intelligence (68T05) Pattern recognition, speech recognition (68T10) Voting theory (91B12) Machine vision and scene understanding (68T45)
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Face recognition using the discrete cosine transform
- Robustness of regional matching scheme over global matching scheme
- A general stability analysis on regional and national voting schemes against noise -- why is an electoral college more stable than a direct popular election?
Cited In (2)
This page was built for publication: Robustness instead of accuracy should be the primary objective for subjective pattern recognition research: stability analysis on multicandidate electoral college versus direct popular vote
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3462269)
