Discrimination between the complementary log-log and logistic model for ordinal data
From MaRDI portal
DOI10.1080/03610928908830028zbMATH Open0696.62257OpenAlexW1971688140MaRDI QIDQ3474037FDOQ3474037
Authors: Balgobin Nandram
Publication date: 1989
Published in: Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/03610928908830028
Recommendations
asymptotic theoryordinal responsecut pointsNelder-Mead algorithmlink functionsdiscriminant indicesseparate families of hypotheses
Cites Work
- The analysis of randomized experiments with orthogonal block structure. I. Block structure and the null analysis of variance
- THE ESTIMATION AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE LOGARITHM OF A RATIO OF FREQUENCIES
- A log gamma model and its maximum likelihood estimation
- Goodness-of-link testing in ordinal regression models
- Goodness of Link Tests for Generalized Linear Models
Cited In (5)
- Sufficient sample size and power in multilevel ordinal logistic regression models
- Let continuous outcome variables remain continuous
- Extension of marginal complementary log-log model and separations of marginal homogeneity for ordinal categorical data
- Cumulative or adjacent logits: Which choice for an ordinal logistic latent variable model?
- Ordinal logic regression: a classifier for discovering combinations of binary markers for ordinal outcomes
This page was built for publication: Discrimination between the complementary log-log and logistic model for ordinal data
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3474037)