Discrimination between the complementary log-log and logistic model for ordinal data

DOI10.1080/03610928908830028MaRDI QIDQ3474037zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Balgobin Nandram

Publication date 1989

Published in Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1080/03610928908830028

zbMATH Keywords

asymptotic theoryordinal responsecut pointsNelder-Mead algorithmlink functionsdiscriminant indicesseparate families of hypotheses

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Classification and discrimination; cluster analysis (statistical aspects) (62H30)

Recommendations

• Goodness-of-link testing in ordinal regression models
• Partial Proportional Odds Models for Ordinal Response Variables
• Overview of multinomial models for ordinal data
• A study of the effect of dichotomizing ordinal data upon modeling
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1455271

Cites work

• A log gamma model and its maximum likelihood estimation
• Goodness of Link Tests for Generalized Linear Models
• Goodness-of-link testing in ordinal regression models
• THE ESTIMATION AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE LOGARITHM OF A RATIO OF FREQUENCIES
• The analysis of randomized experiments with orthogonal block structure. I. Block structure and the null analysis of variance

Cited in

(5)

• Sufficient sample size and power in multilevel ordinal logistic regression models
• Let continuous outcome variables remain continuous
• Extension of marginal complementary log-log model and separations of marginal homogeneity for ordinal categorical data
• Cumulative or adjacent logits: Which choice for an ordinal logistic latent variable model?
• Ordinal logic regression: a classifier for discovering combinations of binary markers for ordinal outcomes

This page was built for publication: Discrimination between the complementary log-log and logistic model for ordinal data

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3474037)