A New Probability Model for Determining Exact P-Values for 2 x 2 Contingency Tables When Comparing Binomial Proportions

DOI10.2307/2531892MaRDI QIDQ3489147zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors William R. Rice

Publication date 1988

Published in Biometrics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.2307/2531892

zbMATH Keywords

contingency testbinomial proportionscomparative trialFisher's ``exact test

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Contingency tables (62H17)

Recommendations

• A Modified Exact Test for 2 × 2 Contingency Tables
• Hypothesis Estimates and Acceptability Profiles for 2 × 2 Contingency Tables
• Improvedp-Value Tests for Comparing Two Independent Binomial Proportions
• A comparison of some conditional and unconditional exact tests for 2x2 contingency tables
• Frequentist Performance of Bayesian Confidence Intervals for Comparing Proportions in 2 × 2 Contingency Tables
• ImprovedP-Values for Testing Marginal Homogeneity in 2 × 2 Contingency Tables

Cited in

(7)

• A cautionary note on exact unconditional inference for a difference between two independent binomial proportions
• On determining the \(P\)-value in \(2\times 2\) multinomial trials
• On accuracy of p-values in binary response models
• On analysis of epidemiological data involving a 2×2 contingency table: an overview of fisher's exact test and yates' correction for continuity
• Small Sample Confidence Intervals for the Odds Ratio
• Optimal unconditional test in \(2\times 2\) multinomial trials
• Choosing the optimal unconditioned test for comparing two independent proportions

This page was built for publication: A New Probability Model for Determining Exact P-Values for 2 x 2 Contingency Tables When Comparing Binomial Proportions

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3489147)