A comparison of explicit optimal design methods

DOI10.1016/0045-7949(89)90083-7MaRDI QIDQ3495879zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Y. Reich, M. B. Fuchs

Publication date 1989

Published in Computers & Structures (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(89)90083-7

zbMATH Keywords

`moving' external penalty functionDisplacement EOD methodelastic trussesForce EOD methodHybrid EOD methodmathematical programmingmultiple loading conditionsselection of the subsetsequence of unconstrained minimization algorithms

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Numerical mathematical programming methods (65K05) Optimization of other properties in solid mechanics (74P10) Optimization problems in solid mechanics (74P99)

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3911891
• Sizing optimization of truss structures by method of centers and force formulation
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4112173
• Merits and limitations of optimality criteria method for structural optimization
• Optimum design of frames under multiple loads

Cited in

(2)

• An analysis of<tex>H^{∞}</tex>-pptimization design methods
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1556142 (Why is no real title available?)

This page was built for publication: A comparison of explicit optimal design methods

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3495879)