Abstract: I argue for a four dimensional, non-dynamical view of space-time, where becoming is not an intrinsic property of reality. This view has many features in common with the Parmenidean conception of the universe. I discuss some recent objections to this position and I offer a comparison of the Parmenidean space-time with an interpretation of Heraclitus' thought that presents no major antagonism.
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3559515 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 810764 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3251314 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3051296 (Why is no real title available?)
- Acyclic colorings of planar graphs
- Can parts of space move? On paragraph six of Newton's Scholium
- Quantum Gravity
- The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time
- Toward an axiomatic pregeometry of space-time
Cited in
(7)- On the ontology of spacetime: substantivalism, relationism, eternalism, and emergence
- Back to Parmenides
- Parmenides demythologised
- From change to spacetime: an eleatic journey
- Physics and philosophy of physics in the work of Mario Bunge
- Neither presentism nor eternalism
- Adversus singularitates: the ontology of space-time singularities
This page was built for publication: Parmenides reloaded
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q351453)
