An Abstract Theory of Argumentation That Accommodates Defeasible Reasoning About Preferences

DOI10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_57zbMATH Open1148.68530OpenAlexW1487795664MaRDI QIDQ3524975FDOQ3524975

Authors: Sanjay Modgil 

Publication date: 16 September 2008

Published in: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_57

Recommendations

• Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
• A general account of argumentation with preferences
• Extending abstract argumentation systems theory
• A system for defeasible argumentation, with defeasible priorities
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1418282

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37)

Cites Work

• An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
• Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
• Computational representation of practical argument
• Hierarchical Argumentation
• Title not available (Why is that?)

Cited In (24)

• Some reflections on two current trends in formal argumentation
• A general account of argumentation with preferences
• Corrigendum to: ``A general account of argumentation with preferences
• AI 2005: Advances in Artificial Intelligence
• Encompassing Attacks to Attacks in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
• Abstract argumentation systems
• Semantics for a theory of defeasible reasoning
• Relating concrete argumentation formalisms and abstract argumentation
• Metalevel argumentation
• CONCILIATORY REASONING, SELF-DEFEAT, AND ABSTRACT ARGUMENTATION
• Towards a general framework for dialogues that accommodate reasoning about preferences
• RAFDivider  : a distributed algorithm for computing semantics in higher-order abstract argumentation frameworks
• Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results
• Relating concrete defeasible reasoning formalisms and abstract argumentation
• Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
• AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks
• Preference-based argumentation built from prioritized logic programming
• Property-based preferences in abstract argumentation
• A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
• Preference in Abstract Argumentation
• A comparative study of assumption-based argumentative approaches to reasoning with priorities
• Combining Modes of Reasoning: An Application of Abstract Argumentation
• Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation
• Meta-argumentation modelling. I: Methodology and techniques

This page was built for publication: An Abstract Theory of Argumentation That Accommodates Defeasible Reasoning About Preferences

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3524975)