Non-clairvoyant Batch Sets Scheduling: Fairness Is Fair Enough

From MaRDI portal
Publication:3527263

DOI10.1007/978-3-540-75520-3_65zbMATH Open1151.90431arXivcs/0612088OpenAlexW1945689612MaRDI QIDQ3527263FDOQ3527263


Authors: Julien Robert, Nicolas Schabanel Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 25 September 2008

Published in: Algorithms – ESA 2007 (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Scheduling questions arise naturally in many different areas among which operating system design, compiling,... In real life systems, the characteristics of the jobs (such as release time and processing time) are usually unknown and unpredictable beforehand. The system is typically unaware of the remaining work in each job or of the ability of the job to take advantage of more resources. Following these observations, we adopt the job model by Edmonds et al (2000, 2003) in which the jobs go through a sequence of different phases. Each phase consists of a certain quantity of work and a speed-up function that models how it takes advantage of the number of processors it receives. We consider the non-clairvoyant online setting where a collection of jobs arrives at time 0. We consider the metrics setflowtime introduced by Robert et al (2007). The goal is to minimize the sum of the completion time of the sets, where a set is completed when all of its jobs are done. If the input consists of a single set of jobs, this is simply the makespan of the jobs; and if the input consists of a collection of singleton sets, it is simply the flowtime of the jobs. We show that the non-clairvoyant strategy EQUIoEQUI that evenly splits the available processors among the still unserved sets and then evenly splits these processors among the still uncompleted jobs of each unserved set, achieves a competitive ratio (2+sqrt3+o(1))frac{ln n}{lnln n} for the setflowtime minimization and that this is asymptotically optimal (up to a constant factor), where n is the size of the largest set. For makespan minimization, we show that the non-clairvoyant strategy EQUI achieves a competitive ratio of (1+o(1))frac{ln n}{lnln n}, which is again asymptotically optimal.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0612088




Recommendations





Cited In (3)





This page was built for publication: Non-clairvoyant Batch Sets Scheduling: Fairness Is Fair Enough

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3527263)