Which Meshes Are Better Conditioned: Adaptive, Uniform, Locally Refined or Locally Adjusted?
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: Adaptive, locally refined and locally adjusted meshes are preferred over uniform meshes for capturing singular or localised solutions. Roughly speaking, for a given degree of freedom a solution associated with adaptive, locally refined and locally adjusted meshes is more accurate than the solution given by uniform meshes. In this work, we answer the question which meshes are better conditioned. We found, for approximately same degree of freedom (same size of matrix), it is easier to solve a system of equations associated with an adaptive mesh.
Recommendations
- Adaptive mesh refinement for localised phenomena
- Comparison of refinement criteria for structured adaptive mesh refinement
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1962933
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4137285
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1442166
- On the performance of adaptive mesh refinement computation
- Adaptive meshing for local quality of FE stresses
- Adaptive mesh refinement strategies in isogeometric analysis -- a computational comparison
- Unstructured adaptive meshes: Bad for your memory?
- A unified framework for the computational comparison of adaptive mesh refinement strategies for all-quadrilateral and all-hexahedral meshes: locally adaptive multigrid methods versus h-adaptive methods
This page was built for publication: Which Meshes Are Better Conditioned: Adaptive, Uniform, Locally Refined or Locally Adjusted?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3545079)