On the stopping distance and the stopping redundancy of codes

From MaRDI portal
Publication:3547600

DOI10.1109/TIT.2005.864441zbMATH Open1317.94153DBLPjournals/tit/SchwartzV06arXivcs/0503058OpenAlexW2140227657WikidataQ59903138 ScholiaQ59903138MaRDI QIDQ3547600FDOQ3547600


Authors: Moshe Schwartz, Alexander Vardy Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 21 December 2008

Published in: IEEE Transactions on Information Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: It is now well known that the performance of a linear code C under iterative decoding on a binary erasure channel (and other channels) is determined by the size of the smallest stopping set in the Tanner graph for C. Several recent papers refer to this parameter as the emph{stopping distance} s of C. This is somewhat of a misnomer since the size of the smallest stopping set in the Tanner graph for C depends on the corresponding choice of a parity-check matrix. It is easy to see that sled, where d is the minimum Hamming distance of C, and we show that it is always possible to choose a parity-check matrix for C (with sufficiently many dependent rows) such that s=d. We thus introduce a new parameter, termed the emph{stopping redundancy} of C, defined as the minimum number of rows in a parity-check matrix H for C such that the corresponding stopping distance s(H) attains its largest possible value, namely s(H)=d. We then derive general bounds on the stopping redundancy of linear codes. We also examine several simple ways of constructing codes from other codes, and study the effect of these constructions on the stopping redundancy. Specifically, for the family of binary Reed-Muller codes (of all orders), we prove that their stopping redundancy is at most a constant times their conventional redundancy. We show that the stopping redundancies of the binary and ternary extended Golay codes are at most 35 and 22, respectively. Finally, we provide upper and lower bounds on the stopping redundancy of MDS codes.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0503058




Recommendations




Cited In (21)





This page was built for publication: On the stopping distance and the stopping redundancy of codes

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3547600)