A polemic for Bayesian statistics

DOI10.1007/978-3-540-85066-3_2zbMATH Open1196.62030OpenAlexW1590995253MaRDI QIDQ3562264FDOQ3562264

Authors: Richard E. Neapolitan 

Publication date: 21 May 2010

Published in: Innovations in Bayesian Networks (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85066-3_2

Recommendations

• The interplay of Bayesian and frequentist analysis
• Why frequentists and Bayesians need each other
• Present Position and Potential Developments: Some Personal Views: Bayesian Statistics
• Tides of change: is Bayesianism the new paradigm in statistics?
• Toward a Reconciliation of the Bayesian and Frequentist Approaches to Point Estimation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Bayesian inference (62F15) History of mathematics in the 20th century (01A60) History of statistics (62-03)

Cites Work

• Outline of a Theory of Statistical Estimation Based on the Classical Theory of Probability
• R. A. Fisher and the fiducial argument
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)

Cited In (12)

• Why Isn't Everyone a Bayesian?
• A 250-year argument: belief, behavior, and the bootstrap
• The interplay of Bayesian and frequentist analysis
• Classical and Bayesian statistics: a survey upon the dualist production
• A battle in the statistics wars: a simulation-based comparison of Bayesian, frequentist and Williamsonian methodologies
• Rejoinder: ``Objections to Bayesian statistics
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Objections to Bayesian statistics
• Why frequentists and Bayesians need each other
• Why I am not a Bayesian
• Bayesians, Frequentists, and Scientists
• A Bayesian paradox

This page was built for publication: A polemic for Bayesian statistics

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3562264)