Developing assessment methodologies for quantitative literacy: a formative study

DOI10.1080/00029890.2008.11920609MaRDI QIDQ3563788zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors Jack Bookman, Susan L. Ganter, Rick Morgan

Publication date 1 June 2010

Published in The American Mathematical Monthly (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1080/00029890.2008.11920609

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Methodology of mathematics (00A35)

Recommendations

• ``Guessing at our mental models or ``committed knowing acts -- what are our students doing?
• Assessing mathematical proficiency
• Rethinking the feedback format in formative assessment of undergraduate mathematical competencies
• Comparison of NAEP, PISA, and TIMSS-R
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1339870

Cited in

(4)

• QUALITY CONTROL METHODS IN LARGE‐SCALE ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES USING ‘DOUBLE‐MARKING’ OR ‘PARTIAL DOUBLE‐MARKING’
• Rethinking the feedback format in formative assessment of undergraduate mathematical competencies
• Asking good questions to understand voluntary enrolments in mathematics
• The effects of enrollment in developmental mathematics upon student achievement in college geometry

This page was built for publication: Developing assessment methodologies for quantitative literacy: a formative study

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3563788)