Incorporating monotonicity into the evaluation of a biomarker
DOI10.1093/BIOSTATISTICS/KXL018zbMATH Open1144.62091OpenAlexW2128174311WikidataQ51935483 ScholiaQ51935483MaRDI QIDQ3592121FDOQ3592121
Authors: Debashis Ghosh 
Publication date: 12 September 2007
Published in: Biostatistics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxl018
Recommendations
- Gumbel regression models for a monotone increasing continuous biomarker subject to measurement error
- Covariate adjustment in continuous biomarker assessment
- Assessing incremental value of biomarkers with multi-phase nested case-control studies
- Improving efficiency in biomarker incremental value evaluation under two-phase designs
- Nonparametric Evaluation of Biomarker Accuracy Under Nested Case-Control Studies
- Combining binary and continuous biomarkers by maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve
- Measuring and visualizing the stability of biomarker selection techniques
- A direct method to evaluate the time-dependent predictive accuracy for biomarkers
- Evaluating the Predictiveness of a Continuous Marker
- Modeling Longitudinal Biomarker Data from Multiple Assays that Have Different Known Detection Limits
generalized linear modelmixed modelmonotone regressionsmoothing splinepooled adjacent violators algorithm
Nonparametric regression and quantile regression (62G08) Estimation in survival analysis and censored data (62N02) Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Medical applications (general) (92C50)
Cited In (6)
- Semiparametric regression during 2003--2007
- Selection models with monotone weight functions in meta analysis
- Testing constancy in monotone response models
- An active set algorithm to estimate parameters in generalized linear models with ordered predictors
- Isotonic boosting classification rules
- Monotone B-Spline Smoothing for a Generalized Linear Model Response
This page was built for publication: Incorporating monotonicity into the evaluation of a biomarker
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3592121)
