Comparison of hierarchical likelihood versus orthodox best linear unbiased predictor approaches for frailty models
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3597971
DOI10.1093/BIOMET/92.3.717zbMATH Open1152.62379OpenAlexW1997199458MaRDI QIDQ3597971FDOQ3597971
Publication date: 29 January 2009
Published in: Biometrika (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/92.3.717
Nonparametric estimation (62G05) Estimation in survival analysis and censored data (62N02) Reliability and life testing (62N05)
Cited In (12)
- Hierarchical likelihood approach for frailty models
- Clustered binary data with random cluster sizes
- Double Hierarchical Generalized Linear Models (With Discussion)
- Modeling clustered binary data with nonparametric unobserved heterogeneity: an application to stock crash analysis
- Modeling proportions and marginal counts simultaneously for clustered multinomial data with random cluster sizes
- Modeling of paired zero-inflated continuous data without breaking down paired designs
- Likelihood inference for models with unobservables: another view
- Bias Reduction of Likelihood Estimators in Semiparametric Frailty Models
- REML estimation for binary data in GLMMs
- A review of h-likelihood for survival analysis
- Two competing linear random-effects models and their connections
- Robust frailty modelling using non-proportional hazards models
This page was built for publication: Comparison of hierarchical likelihood versus orthodox best linear unbiased predictor approaches for frailty models
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3597971)