Falsification or choice among alternatives: The unsolved dilemma of hypothesis testing
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
- The control of statistical hypotheses: a comparison between theories
- Hypothesis testing: A model selection approach
- On the frequentist and Bayesian approaches to hypothesis testing
- The Fisher, Neyman-Pearson Theories of Testing Hypotheses: One Theory or Two?
- A decision-theoretic formulation of Fisher's approach to testing
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3117956 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3822888 (Why is no real title available?)
- IX. On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses
- The 1988 Wald Memorial Lectures: The present position in Bayesian statistics. With comments and a rejoinder by the author
- The problem of inductive inference
Cited in
(9)- Method in experiment: rhetoric and reality
- Withdrawing unfalsifiable hypotheses
- The control of statistical hypotheses: a comparison between theories
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 475229 (Why is no real title available?)
- Resolving Neyman's Paradox
- The falsificationist foundation for null hypothesis significance testing
- Choosing the more likely hypothesis
- Tests of significance vs tests of hypothesis
- Severe Testing as a Basic Concept in a Neyman–Pearson Philosophy of Induction
This page was built for publication: Falsification or choice among alternatives: The unsolved dilemma of hypothesis testing
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3598290)
