Formal Handling of Threats and Rewards in a Negotiation Dialogue
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3623904
DOI10.1007/11794578_6zbMATH Open1236.68244OpenAlexW2295957727MaRDI QIDQ3623904FDOQ3623904
Authors: Leila Amgoud, Henri Prade
Publication date: 28 April 2009
Published in: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/11794578_6
Recommendations
- Handling threats, rewards, and explanatory arguments in a unified setting
- The Logical Handling of Threats, Rewards, Tips, and Warnings
- A formal analysis of the role of argumentation in negotiation dialogues
- Agent argumentation with opinions and advice
- A Protocol for Arguing About Rejections in Negotiation
Cited In (10)
- The Logical Handling of Threats, Rewards, Tips, and Warnings
- Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
- Using arguments for making and explaining decisions
- Audience irrelevance in strategic argumentation games
- Handling threats, rewards, and explanatory arguments in a unified setting
- A formal analysis of the role of argumentation in negotiation dialogues
- Negotiating using rewards
- A Protocol for Arguing About Rejections in Negotiation
- Contracts Violation: Justification via Argumentation
- Agent argumentation with opinions and advice
This page was built for publication: Formal Handling of Threats and Rewards in a Negotiation Dialogue
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3623904)