Formal Handling of Threats and Rewards in a Negotiation Dialogue
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3623904
Recommendations
- Handling threats, rewards, and explanatory arguments in a unified setting
- The Logical Handling of Threats, Rewards, Tips, and Warnings
- A formal analysis of the role of argumentation in negotiation dialogues
- Agent argumentation with opinions and advice
- A Protocol for Arguing About Rejections in Negotiation
Cited in
(14)- Using arguments for making and explaining decisions
- A Protocol for Arguing About Rejections in Negotiation
- A formal analysis of the role of argumentation in negotiation dialogues
- Negotiation and persuasion among agents
- The Logical Handling of Threats, Rewards, Tips, and Warnings
- Negotiating using rewards
- Contracts Violation: Justification via Argumentation
- Agent argumentation with opinions and advice
- Audience irrelevance in strategic argumentation games
- Handling threats, rewards, and explanatory arguments in a unified setting
- Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
- Compromise in negotiation: exploiting worth functions over states
- Approximating agreements in formal argumentation dialogues
- Negotiation statements with promise and threat
This page was built for publication: Formal Handling of Threats and Rewards in a Negotiation Dialogue
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3623904)