Influence of Gauss and Gauss‐Lobatto quadrature rules on the accuracy of a quadrilateral finite element method in the time domain
DOI10.1002/num.20353zbMath1167.65057OpenAlexW2104951519MaRDI QIDQ3629560
P. Grob, Marc Duruflé, Patrick Joly
Publication date: 2 June 2009
Published in: Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/num.20353
numerical resultserror estimatesnumerical integrationfinite element methodsquadrilateral elementsmass lumpingGauss and Gauss-Lobatto quadrature rules
Finite element, Rayleigh-Ritz and Galerkin methods for initial value and initial-boundary value problems involving PDEs (65M60) Error bounds for initial value and initial-boundary value problems involving PDEs (65M15) Initial value problems for second-order hyperbolic equations (35L15) Mesh generation, refinement, and adaptive methods for the numerical solution of initial value and initial-boundary value problems involving PDEs (65M50)
Related Items (20)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Higher-order triangular and tetrahedral finite elements with mass lumping for solving the wave equation
- Higher-order finite elements with mass-lumping for the 1D wave equation
- A mixed finite element approach for viscoelastic wave propagation
- Higher Order Triangular Finite Elements with Mass Lumping for the Wave Equation
- Mixed Higher Order Spectral Finite Elements for Reissner–Mindlin Equations
- HP a-priori error estimates for a non-dissipative spectral discontinuous Galerkin method to solve the Maxwell equations in the time domain
- Approximation by quadrilateral finite elements
- Mixed Spectral Finite Elements for the Linear Elasticity System in Unbounded Domains
- $L^2 $-Estimates for Galerkin Methods for Second Order Hyperbolic Equations
This page was built for publication: Influence of Gauss and Gauss‐Lobatto quadrature rules on the accuracy of a quadrilateral finite element method in the time domain