scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5560595

MaRDI QIDQ3629892zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Walton, Douglas, Fabrizio MacAgno

Publication date 2 June 2009

zbMATH Keywords

human reasoningargumentation schemesAristotle's concept of an enthymemedefeasible argumentations

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Recommendations

• Arguments, proofs, and dialogues
• Interpreting enthymematic arguments using belief revision
• An approach to characterize topic-centered argumentation
• Enthymemes in dialogues

Cited in

(10)

• The three bases for the enthymeme: A dialogical theory
• Logic, reasoning, argumentation: insights from the wild
• Mathematics and argumentation
• A structured bipolar argumentation theory for providing explanations in practical reasoning
• How to think about informal proofs
• A Formalization of the Slippery Slope Argument
• Uncertainty in Argumentation Schemes: Negative Consequences and Basic Slippery Slope
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2211925 (Why is no real title available?)
• A normative framework for argument quality: argumentation schemes with a Bayesian foundation
• Interpreting enthymematic arguments using belief revision

This page was built for publication:

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3629892)