scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5560595

zbMATH Open1179.03011MaRDI QIDQ3629892FDOQ3629892

Authors: Walton, Douglas, Fabrizio MacAgno 

Publication date: 2 June 2009

Title of this publication is not available (Why is that?)

Recommendations

• Arguments, proofs, and dialogues
• Interpreting enthymematic arguments using belief revision
• An approach to characterize topic-centered argumentation
• Enthymemes in dialogues

zbMATH Keywords

human reasoningargumentation schemesAristotle's concept of an enthymemedefeasible argumentations

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Cited In (10)

• A Formalization of the Slippery Slope Argument
• Uncertainty in Argumentation Schemes: Negative Consequences and Basic Slippery Slope
• Logic, Reasoning, Argumentation: Insights from the Wild
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• A structured bipolar argumentation theory for providing explanations in practical reasoning
• Mathematics and argumentation
• Interpreting enthymematic arguments using belief revision
• How to think about informal proofs
• A normative framework for argument quality: argumentation schemes with a Bayesian foundation
• The three bases for the enthymeme: A dialogical theory

This page was built for publication:

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3629892)