About possible extensions of quantum theory
From MaRDI portal
Publication:365779
Abstract: Recently it has been claimed that no extension of quantum theory can have improved predictive power, the statement following, according to the authors, from the assumptions of free will and of the correctness of quantum predictions concerning the correlations of measurement outcomes. Here we prove that the argument is basically awed by an inappropriate use of the assumption of free will. In particular, among other implications, the claim, if correct, would imply that Bohmian Mechanics is incompatible with free will. This statement, appearing in the paper, derives from the unjustified identification of free will with the no-signaling constraint and of a purely formal and not physical use of such a constraint.
Recommendations
Cited in
(11)- The space of logically consistent classical processes without causal order
- Against the `no-go' philosophy of quantum mechanics
- How to extend quantum experiments
- An impossibility theorem for parameter independent hidden variable theories
- Completely real? A critical note on the claims by Colbeck and Renner
- The born rule and free will: why libertarian agent-causal free will is not ``antiscientific
- Some Nearly Quantum Theories
- Extending quantum mechanics entails extending special relativity
- Nonlocal quantum information transfer without superluminal signalling and communication
- On the Colbeck-Renner theorem
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5041838 (Why is no real title available?)
This page was built for publication: About possible extensions of quantum theory
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q365779)