An engineers' defence of the patch test

DOI10.1002/NME.1620190908MaRDI QIDQ3664563zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors B. M. Irons, Matti Loikkanen

Publication date 1983

Published in International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620190908

zbMATH Keywords

patch testconvergence criterionStummel's counter-example explained as technical misunderstanding

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Finite element methods applied to problems in solid mechanics (74S05) Numerical and other methods in solid mechanics (74S99)

Cited in

(11)

• Sur la convergence des méthodes d'éléments finis nonconformes pour des problèmes linéaires de coques minces. (On the convergence of nonconforming finite element method for linear thin shell problems)
• Reduction of excessive energy in the four-noded membrane quadrilateral element. I: Linear theory -- compressible materials
• A new hybrid-mixed variational approach for Reissner-Mindlin plates. The MiSP model
• The arbitrary local mesh replacement method: An alternative to remeshing for crack propagation analysis
• Optimal solid shells for nonlinear analyses of multilayer composites. I: Statics.
• Using only elastic stiffness in nonlinear and postbuckling analysis of structures
• Failures of the three-dimensional patch test for large elastic deformations
• A set of pathological test to validate new finite elements
• On a finite element method with variable element topology
• Elasto-plastic analysis of steel framed structures based on rigid body rule and plastic-hinge concept
• An improved three-node hybrid-mixed element for Mindlin/Reissner plates

This page was built for publication: An engineers' defence of the patch test

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3664563)