An engineers' defence of the patch test

DOI10.1002/NME.1620190908zbMATH Open0516.73080OpenAlexW2009190195MaRDI QIDQ3664563FDOQ3664563

Authors: B. M. Irons, Matti Loikkanen 

Publication date: 1983

Published in: International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620190908

zbMATH Keywords

patch testconvergence criterionStummel's counter-example explained as technical misunderstanding

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Finite element methods applied to problems in solid mechanics (74S05) Numerical and other methods in solid mechanics (74S99)

Cited In (11)

• Sur la convergence des méthodes d'éléments finis nonconformes pour des problèmes linéaires de coques minces. (On the convergence of nonconforming finite element method for linear thin shell problems)
• Reduction of excessive energy in the four-noded membrane quadrilateral element. I: Linear theory -- compressible materials
• A new hybrid-mixed variational approach for Reissner-Mindlin plates. The MiSP model
• The arbitrary local mesh replacement method: An alternative to remeshing for crack propagation analysis
• Optimal solid shells for nonlinear analyses of multilayer composites. I: Statics.
• Using only elastic stiffness in nonlinear and postbuckling analysis of structures
• Failures of the three-dimensional patch test for large elastic deformations
• A set of pathological test to validate new finite elements
• Elasto-plastic analysis of steel framed structures based on rigid body rule and plastic-hinge concept
• On a finite element method with variable element topology
• An improved three-node hybrid-mixed element for Mindlin/Reissner plates

This page was built for publication: An engineers' defence of the patch test

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3664563)