A mean squared error criterion for the design of experiments
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3666076
DOI10.1093/BIOMET/70.1.205zbMATH Open0517.62066OpenAlexW1974689592MaRDI QIDQ3666076FDOQ3666076
Publication date: 1983
Published in: Biometrika (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.1.205
Cited In (14)
- Minimax designs for linear regression models with bias in a reproducing kernel Hilbert space in a discrete set
- Admissible minimum bias estimation of response surfaces
- Treating bias as variance for experimental design purposes
- Model-robust designs for split-plot experiments
- A note on all-bias designs with applications in spline regression models
- Pitfalls of using a single criterion for selecting experimental designs
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Comparison of designs for generalized linear models under model misspecification
- Orthogonal-column Latin hypercube designs with small samples
- Response surface design evaluation and comparison
- Discussion of ``Response surface design evaluation and comparison by C. M. Anderson-Cook, C. M. Borror, and D. C. Montgomery
- Experimental design for estimating the optimum point in a response surface
- Model-robust Bayesian design through generalised additive models for monitoring submerged shoals
- Model-robust and model-sensitive designs
This page was built for publication: A mean squared error criterion for the design of experiments
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3666076)