Remarks on Groenendijk and Stokhof's theory of indirect questions

DOI10.1007/BF00637412zbMATH Open0592.03016OpenAlexW2084925634MaRDI QIDQ3720569FDOQ3720569

Authors: Thomas Zimmermann 

Publication date: 1985

Published in: Linguistics and Philosophy (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00637412

Recommendations

• On the semantics and logic of declaratives and interrogatives
• A theory of contextual propositions for indicatives
• Interrogatives, recursion, and incompleteness
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1180142
• A generalization of inquisitive semantics
• Answering by means of questions in view of inferential erotetic logic
• A semantic model for interrogatives based on generalized quantifiers and bilattices
• The role of indirections in lazy natural semantics
• The dynamic logic of stating and asking: a study of inquisitive dynamic modalities

zbMATH Keywords

extensionalityintensionalitythat-clauseswh-complements

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic of natural languages (03B65)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Universal grammar
• Syntax and semantics of questions
• ‘Who’ and ‘whether’: Towards a theory of indirect question clauses

Cited In (2)

• Intensional logic and two-sorted type theory
• Truth ascriptions, falsity ascriptions, and the paratactic analysis of indirect discourse

This page was built for publication: Remarks on Groenendijk and Stokhof's theory of indirect questions

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3720569)