Invariant monotone coupling need not exist

DOI10.1214/12-AOP767MaRDI QIDQ373574zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Péter Mester

Publication date 17 October 2013

Published in The Annals of Probability (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1011.2283, https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aop/1367241497

zbMATH Keywords

Cayley graphsmonotone couplinginvariant processes

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Trees (05C05) Graph labelling (graceful graphs, bandwidth, etc.) (05C78) Groups as automorphisms of other structures (22F50)

Abstract: We show by example that there is a Cayley graph, having two invariant random subgraphs X and Y, such that there exists a monotone coupling between them in the sense that $XsubsetY$, although no such coupling can be invariant. Here, "invariant" means that the distribution is invariant under group multiplications.

Recommendations

• Invariant random perfect matchings in Cayley graphs
• Monotonicity of avoidance coupling on \(K_N\)
• On monotonicity and couplings of random currents and the loop-\(\mathrm{O}(1)\)-model
• Couplings of uniform spanning forests
• Avoidance couplings on non‐complete graphs

Cites work

• Couplings of uniform spanning forests
• Group-invariant percolation on graphs
• Probability on trees and networks
• Processes on unimodular random networks
• Uniform spanning forests

Cited in

(4)

• A monotone Sinai theorem
• Constrained percolation in two dimensions
• Interlacements and the wired uniform spanning forest
• Invariant coupling of determinantal measures on sofic groups

This page was built for publication: Invariant monotone coupling need not exist

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q373574)