Deux moments de la critique du calcul infinitésimal : Michel Rolle et George Berkeley
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:3752344)
Recommendations
Cited in
(14)- Thomas Simpson: weaving fluxions in 18th-century London
- Geometrization or mathematization: Christiaan Huygens's critiques of infinitesimal analysis in his correspondence with Leibniz
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3315152 (Why is no real title available?)
- Paulian's commentaire on L'Hospital's \textit{Analyse des infiniment petits}: on how to teach differential calculus in the 1760s
- Du Châtelet on the need for mathematics in physics
- Detleff Clüver: An Early Opponent of the Leibnizian Differential Calculus
- Periodic words connected with the tribonacci-Lucas numbers
- The wake of Berkeley's analyst: Rigor mathematicae?
- Berkeley and the mathematical hypotheses
- Proofs and retributions, or: why Sarah can't take limits
- Lagrange in the Netherlands: Dutch attempts to obtain rigor in calculus, 1797-1840
- One of Berkeley's arguments on compensating errors in the calculus
- The metaphysics of the calculus: A foundational debate in the Paris Academy of Sciences, 1700-1706
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4021056 (Why is no real title available?)
This page was built for publication: Deux moments de la critique du calcul infinitésimal : Michel Rolle et George Berkeley
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3752344)