Traditions of the diagram, tradition of the text: a case study

DOI10.1007/S11229-012-0073-3zbMATH Open1274.01012OpenAlexW2082584839MaRDI QIDQ375266FDOQ375266

Ken Saito

Publication date: 29 October 2013

Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0073-3

zbMATH Keywords

diagramEuclidElementsmanuscript

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Methodology of mathematics (00A35) History of Greek and Roman mathematics (01A20) History of geometry (51-03) Euclidean geometries (general) and generalizations (51M05)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• The Wrong Text of Euclid: On Heiberg's Text and its Alternatives
• Diagrams in ancient Egyptian geometry. Survey and assessment

Cited In (4)

• Accounting for overspecification and indifference to visual accuracy in manuscript diagrams: a tentative explanation based on transmission
• Are Euclid’s Diagrams ‘Representations’? On an Argument by Ken Manders
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Diagrams in the Arabic Euclidean tradition: a preliminary assessment

Uses Software

• DRaFT

This page was built for publication: Traditions of the diagram, tradition of the text: a case study

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q375266)